|
Comparing worldviews: Consider these different "worldviews." Each one encapsulates a different concept of the human econiche in the larger ecosystem. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Experience of Colonialism and the Narratives it Spawns |
|
|
Our Cultural "Blind Spots" |
|
|
Empathy and the evolution of the humane |
|
|
|
|
|
The Repeated Consequences of the "Flawed" Worldview of Finance Capital |
|
|
Cheap oil made suburbia possible...Suburbia made cheap oil necessary....and a whole lot more
as well. |
|
|
Beyond suburbia, cheap oil has made a lot of other things both possible and necessary as well. Consider the structure of "modern" agriculture.
Class 9b - "The World According to Monsanto," Google Video, (30 April 2008).
Nota Bene: See also:
The
Future of Food - Lily Films (from week 3 above).
Petro-intensive Agriculture: The Trap Our Leaders Have All Walked Into: |
To recognize the gravity of our human circumstance we need to remember the obvious fact that there is no such thing as a "post-agricultural" society. Further, we need to understand that the so-called "productivity" of "modern" agriculture has come almost entirely from a non-renewable resource base. What should be our "primary productivity" (ie. the biological capture of energy from the sun), has come to depend almost entirely upon something we now know we are running out of -- cheap oil. Increases in production (a question of volume produced) have been mistaken for increases in "productivity" (a ratio of outputs to inputs). Contrary to popular perception, any qualified agro-ecologist will tell you that in terms of returns to kilocalorie energy inputs, global agriculture has declined significantly in the last fifty years because of the "green revolution."
The trouble is, very few people realized this. The reason is simple. Since oil has been so cheap during the recent "up slope phase" in the global energy peak the actual decline in the energy productivity of agriculture was effectively masked by an enormous increase in the over all volume of production. In this exceptional moment over the last fifty years, the choice to invest heavily in petro-intensive agriculture may have seemed to make sense to those whose primary focus was upon returns to invested "money capital." In the long run, however, this whole process makes no sense ecologically. Indeed, expanding petro-intesive agriculture constitutes an "energy sink." This is because current photosynthate is being subsidized by fossilized photosynthate.
Energy sinks in agriculture do not last long because they cannot -- no matter how "profitable" they prove to be for those who have make money from them in the short run. They may seem to represent a momentary triumph of "market fundamentalism" over ecological processes, but in the long run ecological realities will overrule the "virtual reality" of money profit, and the systems upon which they are based will collapse with considerable tragedy experienced by all those who came to believe religiously in this illusory form of fundamentalism.
|
|
|
|
Land Management and the Global Commons: Forests, Oceans, Air |
|
|
Class 10a - "The Spill," PBS - Frontline, (26 October 2010). |
|
|
Consider the "investor's" mindset in approaching our evident and increasing environmental constraints... |
|
|
Energy - Fossil Fuel Predicament: It is hard to overcome an addiction...Simply more investment cannot be a long-term solution. Dan Yergin seems to have lost his focus.... |
|
|
Energy - Nuclear Power's Multiple Problems |
|
|
Capital Intensive Agriculture - What are the externalities and hidden costs?
|
|
|
Continuous
Assault of Resource Extraction & Industrial Pollution |
|
|
Why is the climate impact of waste CO2 considered an economic "externality?" This could be the biggest "market failure" in human history. Are we prepared for the costs we will already have to pay for our past carbon usage? |
|
|
If we do not want to change our habits, then perhaps we can change the world system itself instead... |
|
|